I have to thank Arfrerver for making me notice this with the bug about Ruby 1.9 he reported.
The GNU project released autoconf 2.66 two days ago. Very few notable changes are present in it, just like a few were listed before, so I didn’t go out of my way to test it beforehand. My bad! Indeed there is one big nasty change with it for which I’d say to all of you to put off the update until I write it so. Hopefully it won’t get unmasked in Gentoo for a while either.
There are two main problems with this release; the first is due to the implementation of a stricter macro to ensure the parameters given to it is not variable over executions:
**** The macro AS_LITERAL_IF is slightly more conservative; text containing shell quotes are no longer treated as literals. Furthermore, a new macro, AS_LITERAL_WORD_IF, adds an additional level of checking that no whitespace occurs in literals.
well, whatever the idea about this was, it seems to have broken the
AC_CHECK_SIZEOF macro: if you pass it
[void*] as parameter, it’ll report it not being a literal (while it is) causing the following error:
flame@yamato test % cat configure.ac AC_INIT([foo], ) AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([void*]) AC_OUTPUT flame@yamato test % autoconf configure.ac:3: error: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF: requires literal arguments ../../lib/autoconf/types.m4:765: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF is expanded from... configure.ac:3: the top level autom4te-2.66: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
This would be bad enough. But the nastier surprise I got when running
autoreconf over the feng sources, the build system of which I wrote myself, and if I may say so, is very well engineered:
flame@yamato feng % autoreconf -fis configure:6275: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FDdnl If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf-2.66: /usr/bin/autoconf-2.66 failed with exit status: 1
The problem here is almost obvious, and it’s related to the
dnl entry at end of the macro name; the
dnl keyword is used as (advanced) comment delimiter in autoconf scripts, meaning “Discard up to New Line” and is often used to keep on multiple lines commands that should be kept togever, like
is in many languages. A quick check at the
configure files brings in this:
as_fn_error $? "Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.16 gthread-2.0) were not met: $GLIB_PKG_ERRORS Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GLIB_CFLAGS and GLIB_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details." "$LINENO" AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FDdnl
You can easily see that the problem here is with the
pkg-config macros (
pkg.m4). Funnily enough there is no change related to the errors reporting that is listed in the autoconf news file so I wasn’t expecting this. The problem is further down the path of
pkg-config files but it’s not important to fully debug it right now, it’s actually quite easy to fix, in
pkg-config itself, but here’s the catch.
pkg.m4 macro file is way too often bundled with the upstream packaging, and its presence overrides the copy from the system, even fixing
pkg-config will not fix all the software that carries outdated copies of the macro file.
This is almost the same problem with libtool 1 vs libtool 2 macro files with the difference that this is going to be much much more common. If you’re a package maintainer, you can do something already before this even hits the users: remove the
pkg.m4 file during the
src_prepare() phase; you’re already depending on
pkg-config in the ebuild for it to work at build-time, and since we don’t split the macro file from the command itself, you can simply rely on its presence on the system.
In the mean time, I’m not sure if I want to start testing with it just yet or if we should be waiting for 2.67…
i just encountered the same problem and found a patchhttp://osdir.com/ml/autocon…ty for the info, that helped me a lot.
2.67 has been released now, can you test if the problem with pkg.m4 disappeared?